Cabergoline versus calcium infusion in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomised controlled study.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of calcium infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in IVF patients at high risk for OHSS. One hundred and seventy patients who were stimulated using the long luteal GnRH agonist protocol and at high risk for developing OHSS were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to cabergoline group and calcium gluconate group. In cabergoline group, 0.5 mg of cabergoline was administered once daily p.o. for eight days starting on the day of HCG administration. In calcium gluconate group, intravenous calcium gluconate (10%, 10 ml in 200 ml of physiologic saline) was administered daily for four days starting on the day of ovum pickup. Six patients in cabergoline group and eight patients in calcium gluconate group developed moderate OHSS. One patient in each group developed severe OHSS. The incidence of moderate/severe OHSS was comparable between both groups (8.24% vs. 10.59%, p value = .599, OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.269-2.138]). The implantation, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were similar in the two groups (16.91% vs. 15.84%, p = .771, 35.29% vs. 32.94%, p = .746, and 30.59% vs. 28.24%, p = .736, respectively). In conclusion, calcium infusion and cabergoline have comparable effectiveness in the prevention of OHSS. Both drugs are well tolerated, cheap and have no adverse effects on the reproductive outcomes of IVF cycle.Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered on clinical trials.gov database [NCT02875587].Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The effectiveness of cabergoline in the prevention of OHSS in IVF patients at high risk for OHSS is confirmed by overwhelming scientific evidence. Calcium infusion is a novel strategy for prevention of OHSS. Few studies reported the use of calcium infusion in the prevention of OHSS. A retrospective study and a randomised controlled study revealed that calcium infusion reduces the incidence of OHSS. Moreover, a quasi-randomised study revealed that calcium infusion is as effective as cabergoline in the prevention of OHSS.What the results of this study add? Calcium infusion and cabergoline have comparable effectiveness in the prevention of OHSS. Both drugs are well tolerated, cheap and have no adverse effects on the reproductive outcomes of IVF cycle.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Calcium infusion should be used to minimise the incidence of OHSS in IVF patients at high risk for OHSS.

Prolactin Response to Metformin in Cabergoline-Resistant Prolactinomas: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cabergoline is the treatment of choice for prolactinomas. However, 10-20% of prolactinomas are resistant to cabergoline. Metformin, a biguanide widely used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, has been shown to reduce prolactin secretion in various pituitary tumor-cell lineages both in vitro and in vivo and in human pituitary adenomas in vitro. The aim of this study is to test the effects of metformin addition to cabergoline treatment on prolactin levels in patients with resistant prolactinomas. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study performed in an outpatient clinic in a reference center. Ten adult patients (26-61 years) with prolactinomas (7 M), persistent hyperprolactinemia (38-386 ng/mL) under cabergoline treatment (2-7 mg/week) for at least 6 months (6-108 months), features of metabolic syndrome, and not taking metformin were included. Metformin (1.0-2.5 g v.o./day) was given according to patients' tolerance. Cabergoline doses were kept unchanged. Serum prolactin levels were measured before and after short- (30-60 days) and long-term (120-180 days) metformin treatment. RESULTS: Mean prolactin levels did not show any significant changes (148 ± 39 vs. 138 ± 42 vs. 133 ± 39 ng/mL, before, at 30-60 days, and at 120-180 days, respectively, p = 0.196) after metformin (mean dose: 1.25 g/day; range: 1.0-2.0 g/day). No patient reached a normal prolactin level during metformin treatment. Two patients were considered partial responders for exhibiting prolactin decreases ≥50% at a single time point during metformin. CONCLUSION: Metformin addition to ongoing high-dose cabergoline treatment in patients with cabergoline-resistant prolactinomas failed to show a consistent inhibitory effect in serum prolactin levels.

Cabergoline possesses a beneficial effect on blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity against lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

Sepsis is a disease induced by severe systemic inflammation and contributes to multiple acute organic dysfunctions. It is reported that disrupted blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity is involved in sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE), which can be alleviated by repairing the damaged tight junction structure. Cabergoline is a specific dopamine D2 receptor agonist developed to treat Parkinson's disease and hyperprolactinemia and is reported to exert promising anti-inflammatory properties. The present study aimed to explore the beneficial effect of Cabergoline for the treatment of sepsis. In the animal experiments, mice were separated into 4 groups: sham, LPS (5 mg/kg), Cabergoline (0.1 mg/kg/day), and Cabergoline+LPS. We found that the increased neurological deficits, disrupted BBB integrity, elevated production of inflammatory factors, and declined expression level of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) were observed in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated mice, all of which were significantly reversed by the administration of Cabergoline. In the in vitro model, human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) were challenged with 1 µg/mL LPS in the presence or absence of Cabergoline (10, 20 µM) for 24 hours. The elevated cell permeability Papp value of fluorescein disodium across the HBMECs monolayer and declined trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) in the LPS-treated HBMECs were significantly alleviated by Cabergoline, accompanied by the upregulation of ZO-1. In addition, wnt1 and ß-catenin were found downregulated, which was reversed by Cabergoline. Importantly, the protective benefits of Cabergoline were all abolished by the overexpression of Dickkopf 3 (DKK3). Taken together, our data reveal that Cabergoline possessed a protective effect on BBB integrity against LPS.

THE EFFECTS OF ETANERCEPT AND CABERGOLINE ON ENDOMETRIOTIC IMPLANTS, UTERUS AND OVARIES IN RAT ENDOMETRIOSIS MODEL.

The pathophysiology of endometriosis is still unknown and treatment options remain controversial. Searches focus on angiogenesis, stem cells, immunologic and inflammatory factors. This study investigated the effects of etanercept and cabergoline on ovaries, ectopic, and eutopic endometrium in an endometriosis rat model. This randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study included 50 rats, Co(control), Sh(Sham), Cb(cabergoline), E(etanercept), and E + Cb(etanercept + cabergoline) groups. After surgical induction of endometriosis, 2nd operation was performed for endometriotic volume and AMH level. After 15 days of treatment: AMH level, flow cytometry, implant volume, histologic scores, immunohistochemical staining of ectopic, eutopic endometrium, and ovary were evaluated at 3rd operation. All groups had significantly reduced volume, TNF-α, VEGF, and CD 146/PDGF-Rß staining of endometriotic implants comparing to the Sh group (p < 0.05).TNF-α staining of eutopic endometrium in all treatment groups was similar to Sh and Co groups (p > 0.05). E and E + Cb groups significantly decreased TNF-α staining in the ovary comparing to Sh, Co, and Cb groups (p < 0.05). All treatment groups had significantly higher AFC compared to the Sh group. CD25+ Cells' median percentage was significantly increased in the E + Cb group compared to Co, Sh, Cb, and E group. E + Cb group had a significantly higher CD5+ Cells' level than the Co group (p = 0.035). In conclusion; Etanercept and/or Cabergoline decreased volume, TNF-α, VEGF, and CD 146/PDGF-Rß staining of the ectopic endometrial implant. E and E + Cb treatment decreased TNF-α levels in the ovary. E + Cb also increased peripheral blood CD25+ & CD5+ Cell's.

Increased prevalence of impulse control disorder symptoms in endocrine diseases treated with dopamine agonists: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Impulse control disorders (ICDs) have been described as a side effect of dopamine agonists (DAs) in neurological as well as endocrine conditions. Few studies have evaluated the neuropsychological effect of DAs in hyperprolactinemic patients, and these have reported a relationship between DAs and ICDs. Our objective was to screen for ICD symptoms in individuals with DA-treated endocrine conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 132 patients with pituitary disorders treated with DAs (DA exposed), as well as 58 patients with pituitary disorders and no history of DA exposure (non-DA exposed). Participants responded to the full version of the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's disease (QUIP). RESULTS: Compared with the non-DA-exposed group, a higher prevalence of DA-exposed patients tested positive for symptoms of any ICD or related behavior (52% vs. 31%, p < 0.01), any ICD (46% vs. 24%, p < 0.01), any related behavior (31% vs. 17%, p < 0.05), compulsive sexual behavior (27% vs. 14%, p < 0.04), and punding (20% vs. 7%, p < 0.02) by QUIP. On univariate analysis, DA treatment was associated with a two- to threefold increased risk of any ICD or related behavior [odds ratio (OR) 2.43] and any ICD (OR 2.70). In a multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for any ICD or related behavior were DA use (adjusted OR 2.22) and age (adjusted OR 6.76). Male gender was predictive of the risk of hypersexuality (adjusted OR 3.82). DISCUSSION: Despite the QUIP limitations, a clear sign of increased risk of ICDs emerges in individuals with DA-treated pituitary disorders. Our data contribute to the growing evidence of DA-induced ICDs in endocrine conditions.

Effectiveness of Cabergoline Treatment in Patients with Acromegaly Uncontrolled with SSAs: Experience of a Single Tertiary Center.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of cabergoline and the parameters affecting cabergoline response as add-on treatment to somatostatin analaogues (SSA) in patients with acromegaly uncontrolled with SSAs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred and twenty-nine acromegalic patients uncontrolled with SSA who had cabergoline added to their treatment were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into the SSAs + cabergoline-responsive (group 1) and non-responsive groups (group 2), and biochemical, pathologic, and radiologic parameters were assessed. RESULTS: IGF-1 normalization was achieved in 75 of 129 patients (58%) when cabergoline was added to the SSA treatment. Female patients were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (p=0.006). Group 1 had significantly smaller pre- and post-cabergoline tumor size (p=0.011, p=0.007 respectively), lower levels of IGF-1 in pre-and post-operative period (p=0.040, p=0.001), and lower levels of IGF-1 in pre- and post-cabergoline treatment (p<0.001). Cavernous invasion on sellar magnetic resonance imaging, dural invasion in pathologic examination were not significantly different between the groups. Sellar invasion in pathologic examination was significantly higher in group 1 (p=0.011). No significant difference was found in proliferation indices between two groups. The presence of fibrous bodies was significantly lower in group 1 (p=0.010). CONCLUSION: Cabergoline can be added to the treatment of acromegalic patients uncontrolled with SSAs due to its ease of use and low economic cost, especially in patients with acromegaly who have small adenomas and no fibrous bodies.

Medical Therapy of Acromegaly in Germany 2019 - Data from the German Acromegaly Registry.

CONTEXT: Acromegaly is a rare disease caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion from pituitary adenomas in most cases. If neurosurgical therapy is contraindicated or not sufficient, medical therapy is the second line therapy. OBJECTIVE: To describe current medical therapy in acromegaly. DESIGN & METHODS: Retrospective data analysis from 2732 patients treated in 69 centers of the German Acromegaly Registry. 749 patients were seen within the recent 18 months, of which 420 were on medical therapy (56.1%). RESULTS: 73% of medically treated acromegalic patients had normal/low IGF-1 levels. 57% of patients with non-normalized IGF-1 levels had an IGF-1 value between 1- and 1.25-fold above the upper limit of normal. Most patients (55%) received somatostatin analogs as monotherapy, 12% GH receptor monotherapy, and 9% dopamine agonist therapy. Doses of each medical therapy varied widely, with 120 mg lanreotide LAR every 4 weeks, 30 mg octreotide LAR every 4 weeks, 140 mg pegvisomant per week and 1mg cabergoline per week being the most frequent used regimens. A combination of different medical regimens was used in almost 25% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The majority of German acromegalic patients receiving medical therapy are controlled according to normal IGF-1 levels.

Oxytocin and cabergoline alleviate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by suppressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in an experimental model.

PURPOSE: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a life-threatening complication of ovarian stimulation in reproductive medicine. Here, we aimed to investigate the role of oxytocin (OT) and cabergoline in the prevention and alleviation of the OHSS in an animal model. METHODS: Thirty-five female immature Wistar rats were randomly assigned to five groups. The control group (n = 7) received saline only for five consecutive days. Remaining twenty-eight rats received 10 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) followed by 30 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to induce OHSS. Group 2 (n = 7) was managed with no additional intervention after the induction of OHSS. Group 3 (n = 7) received 100 µg/kg cabergoline 2 h before the PMSG injection for four consecutive days and 2 h before the hCG injection on the fifth day. Group 4 (n = 7) and group 5 (n = 7) received 80 µg/kg and 160 µg/kg OT after induction of OHSS, respectively. Oxytocin was administered 2 h before the PMSG injection for four consecutive days and 2 h before the hCG injection on the fifth day. Body and ovary weight, vascular permeability (VP), VEGF expression in the ovaries, and levels of VEGF in the peritoneal fluids were examined in all animals. RESULTS: Cabergoline and OT reduced body weight, ovary weight, and VP compared to that of the OHSS group (p < 0.05). VEGF expressions in ovaries and peritoneal VEGF levels were decreased in cabergoline and OT groups compared to that of the OHSS groups (p < 0.001 for cabergoline and OT-80 µg/kg; p < 0.00001 for OT-160 µg/kg). However, there was no statistically significant difference in these parameters between the OT and cabergoline groups. CONCLUSION: Both OT and cabergoline were active in the alleviation of OHSS through suppression of VEGF and VP. Overall, we conclude that OT is effective for downregulation for VEGF and improvement in vascular permeability in OHSS.

High biochemical recurrence rate after withdrawal of cabergoline in prolactinomas: is it necessary to restart treatment?

PURPOSE: Treatment with dopamine agonists (DA) is highly effective in patients with prolactinomas. In selected patients, discontinuation of DA after several years of successful treatment is possible, however, hyperprolactinemia recurs in 60-80% of them. It is unclear what is the clinical significance of these recurrences and hence, whether or not reinitiation of therapy is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the recurrence rate in prolactinoma patients after DA withdrawal and the necessity to restart treatment. METHODS: Patients with >2 years of treatment with cabergoline (CBG) who achieved normoprolactinemia and a > 50% reduction in tumor size were included. DA dose was down titrated until withdrawal. Basal tumor size, as well as PRL and gonadal steroid levels were recorded at diagnosis, at withdrawal of DA and every 3-6 months for 1-3 years. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included (38 women, 34 macroprolactinomas). After withdrawal, 34 (68%) presented recurrence of hyperprolactinemia. PRL levels <5 ng/mL at the time of withdrawal predicted remission (sensitivity 76%, specificity of 63%). CBG was restarted in eight patients (23%) because of the presence of hypogonadism. CBG was withheld in the remaining 26, based on the following arguments: (1) premenopausal women without biochemical hypogonadism, (54%); (2) asymptomatic men under 65 without biochemical hypogonadism (19%); (3) asymptomatic postmenopausal women (19%); (4) asymptomatic men over 65 (8%). After a median follow-up of 30 months, no increase in PRL levels or tumor growth was documented. CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical recurrence in prolactinomas is very frequent, however, in only a few of these patients reinitiation of DA is necessary.

Phenotype and resistance patterns of 10 resistant prolactinomas / Fenotipo y patrones de resistencia de 10 prolactinomas resistentes

Background: Dopamine agonists (DA) are the first-line therapy in prolactinomas, but they fail to decrease prolactin (PRL) levels and/or tumor size in some of these tumors, which are labeled as resistant prolactinomas (RP). To date, risk factors for DA resistance are not fully understood and management of DA-RP is not well established. Methods: We retrospectively recorded clinical, biochemical and radiological features, as well as management and outcome, of all cabergoline (CAB)-RP attended at the Endocrinology department of a tertiary hospital between 1995 and 2016. CAB resistance was defined as the failure to normalize PRL (biochemical resistance, BR) or reduce tumor size by at least 50% (morphological resistance, MR) with a CAB dose up to 2 mg/week (or 3 mg/week in cases where lower doses were not tested) for at least 3 months. Results: Ten CAB-RP were found. The mean age of the cohort was 30.6 years and 50% of subjects were male. The average tumor size was 1.78 cm (80% macroadenomas). The mean maximal dose of CAB was 3.8 mg/week. Five patients showed isolated MR, four combined MR + BR and only one isolated BR. MR patients were more often males and older than MR + BR patients. Transsphenoidal surgery achieved normalization of PRL and/or disappearance of tumor in three of seven patients. At the end of follow up all patients had controlled PRL levels (with or without CAB) and most of them bore a visible although stable tumor. Conclusions: Isolated MR and combined MR + BR are the most frequent patterns of DA resistance whereas isolated BR seems to be uncommon. Our data support a high tumor size but not male gender as a risk factor for DA resistance

Contexto: Los agonistas dopaminérgicos (AD) son el tratamiento de elección de los prolactinomas, pero en algunos casos no logran normalizar los niveles de prolactina (PRL) o disminuir el tamaño del tumor, y estos casos se etiquetan como prolactinomas resistentes (PR). Los factores de riesgo de resistencia a los AD y el manejo de los PR no están bien establecidos. Métodos: Analizamos retrospectivamente las características clínicas, bioquímicas y radiológicas, así como el manejo y evolución de los PR a cabergolina (CAB) atendidos en el departamento de Endocrinología de un hospital terciario entre 1995 y 2016. La resistencia a CAB se definió como persistencia de PRL elevada (resistencia bioquímica, RB) o reducción tumoral inferior al 50% (resistencia morfológica, RM) tras al menos 3 meses de tratamiento con una dosis de CAB de hasta 2 mg/semana (o 3 mg/semana en los casos que no recibieron dosis inferiores) Resultados: Se incluyeron 10 pacientes, edad media 30.6 años, 50% varones. El tamaño medio del tumor fue 1.78 cm (80% macroadenomas) y la dosis máxima media de CAB 3.8 mg/semana. Cinco pacientes presentaron RM aislada, cuatro RM + RB y uno RB aislada. La prevalencia de sexo masculino y la edad fueron superiores en el grupo RM comparado con el grupo RM + RB. La cirugía transesfenoidal logró normalización de PRL y/o desaparición del tumor en tres de siete pacientes. Al final del seguimiento la PRL era normal (con o sin CAB) en todos los casos y la mayoría presentaba un tumor visible de tamaño estable. Conclusiones: la RM aislada y la RM+RB combinadas son los patrones más frecuentes de resistencia a los AD. Nuestros datos apoyan la asociación del tamaño tumoral pero no del sexo masculino con la resistencia a los AD

Case of fertility treatment-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome with a severe ocular complication.

Pharmacological regimens with multiple medications are being used in fertility treatments. Herein, we report a case of a 40-year-old Japanese woman who developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) with a severe ocular complication during fertility treatment. Despite early multimodal interventions, including methylprednisolone pulse therapy and plasma exchange, her ocular complications persisted for more than a year. The four drugs administered in this case (cabergoline, medroxyprogesterone acetate, clomiphene, and intravenous human chorionic gonadotropin) have never been reported to induce SJS. Based on this case, we suggest that obstetricians, gynecologists, and dermatologists should be aware of fertility treatment-induced severe drug eruptions.

Dopamine D2 receptor stimulation modulates the balance between ignoring and updating according to baseline working memory ability.

BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) deficits in neuropsychiatric disorders have often been attributed to altered dopaminergic signalling. Specifically, D2 receptor stimulation is thought to affect the ease with which items can be gated into and out of WM. In addition, this effect has been hypothesised to vary according to baseline WM ability, a putative index of dopamine synthesis levels. Moreover, whether D2 stimulation affects WM vicariously through modulating relatively WM-free cognitive control processes has not been explored. AIMS: We examined the effect of administering a dopamine agonist on the ability to ignore or update information in WM. METHOD: A single dose of cabergoline (1 mg) was administered to healthy older adult humans in a within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In addition, we obtained measures of baseline WM ability and relatively WM-free cognitive control (overcoming response conflict). RESULTS: Consistent with predictions, baseline WM ability significantly modulated the effect that drug administration had on the proficiency of ignoring and updating. High-WM individuals were relatively better at ignoring compared to updating after drug administration. Whereas the opposite occurred in low-WM individuals. Although the ability to overcome response conflict was not affected by cabergoline, a negative relationship between the effect the drug had on response conflict performance and ignoring was observed. Thus, both response conflict and ignoring are coupled to dopaminergic stimulation levels. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulatively, these results provide evidence that dopamine affects subcomponents of cognitive control in a diverse, antagonistic fashion and that the direction of these effects is dependent upon baseline WM.

Pegvisomant in acromegaly: a multicenter real-life study in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the long term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant (PEGV), and the predictors of treatment response in patients with acromegaly in the real life setting. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, hormonal and radiological data of acromegalic patients treated with PEGV in 17 Argentine centers. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (age range 22-77, 51 females) with acromegaly have been treated with PEGV for up to 118 months (median 27 months). Before PEGV, 97.3% of patients had been treated with medical therapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy, two patients had no previous treatment. At that time, all patients had an IGF-1 above the upper normal limit (ULN) (mean 2.4 x ULN ± 0.98, range 1.25-7). At diagnosis of acromegaly 84% presented macroadenomas, prior to PEGV only 23,5% of patients remained with tumor remnant > 1 cm, the remaining showed normal or less than 1 cm images. Disease control (IGF-1 ≤ 1.2 x ULN) was achieved in 62.9% of patients with a mean dose of 11.8 mg/day. Thirty-four patients (45%) received PEGV monotherapy, while 41 (55%) received combined therapy with either somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline. Adverse events related to PEGV were: local injection site reaction in 5.3%, elevated liver enzymes in 9.3%, and tumor size growth in 9.8%. Pre-PEGV IGF-I level was the only predictor of treatment response: 2.1 x ULN vs 2.8 x ULN in controlled and uncontrolled patients respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: this long term experience indicates PEGV treatment was highly effective and safe in our series of Argentine patients with acromegaly refractory to standard therapies. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(4):320-7.

Brazilian multicenter study on pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. RESULTS: 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies.

Brazilian multicenter study on pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly

ABSTRACT Objective Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. Subjects and methods Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. Results 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. Conclusions In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies.

Pegvisomant in acromegaly: a multicenter real-life study in Argentina

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the long term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant (PEGV), and the predictors of treatment response in patients with acromegaly in the real life setting. Subjects and methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, hormonal and radiological data of acromegalic patients treated with PEGV in 17 Argentine centers. Results Seventy-five patients (age range 22-77, 51 females) with acromegaly have been treated with PEGV for up to 118 months (median 27 months). Before PEGV, 97.3% of patients had been treated with medical therapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy, two patients had no previous treatment. At that time, all patients had an IGF-1 above the upper normal limit (ULN) (mean 2.4 x ULN ± 0.98, range 1.25-7). At diagnosis of acromegaly 84% presented macroadenomas, prior to PEGV only 23,5% of patients remained with tumor remnant > 1 cm, the remaining showed normal or less than 1 cm images. Disease control (IGF-1 ≤ 1.2 x ULN) was achieved in 62.9% of patients with a mean dose of 11.8 mg/day. Thirty-four patients (45%) received PEGV monotherapy, while 41 (55%) received combined therapy with either somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline. Adverse events related to PEGV were: local injection site reaction in 5.3%, elevated liver enzymes in 9.3%, and tumor size growth in 9.8%. Pre-PEGV IGF-I level was the only predictor of treatment response: 2.1 x ULN vs 2.8 x ULN in controlled and uncontrolled patients respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion this long term experience indicates PEGV treatment was highly effective and safe in our series of Argentine patients with acromegaly refractory to standard therapies. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(4):320-7

Use of cabergoline and post-collection GnRH antagonist administration for prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the addition of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist to cabergoline treatment during the luteal phase in fresh IVF cycles triggered with a GnRH agonist, and planned for freeze-all, reduce the rate of mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 480 IVF patients at risk for OHSS with GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2018, stratified into three groups based on treatment received: GnRH agonist trigger alone (Group 1, n = 208), GnRH agonist trigger + cabergoline (Group 2, n = 167) or GnRH agonist trigger + cabergoline + GnRH antagonist (Group 3, n = 105). Data on patient demographics, incidence, severity and symptomatology of OHSS and laboratory findings were collected. RESULTS: Group 1 had more free peritoneal fluid than Group 2 (28% versus 19%, P = 0.04) or Group 3 (28% versus 5%, P = 0.001). Group 1 reported abdominal discomfort and bloating more than Group 2 (33% versus 21%, P = 0.01) or Group 3 (33% versus 18%, P = 0.006). Group 1 had more electrolyte abnormalities than Group 2, who had more than Group 3. No patients developed severe OHSS. Mild and moderate OHSS rate was higher in Group 1 (38%) than Group 2 (29%, P = 0.048) or Group 3 (18%, P = 0.006) and in Group 2 than Group 3 (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Addition of cabergoline to GnRH agonist triggering in high-risk OHSS patients, and subsequent addition of GnRH antagonist for 5 days in the luteal phase, sequentially reduces the risk of mild and moderate OHSS and improves patient comfort compared with GnRH agonist trigger alone.

Start low, go slowly - mental abnormalities in young prolactinoma patients under cabergoline therapy.

Background Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence are rare. First-line therapy consists of dopamine agonists (DAs) like cabergoline. Experience in treating prolactinomas in paediatric and adolescent patients is limited. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of clinical data, laboratory data, radiological findings and medical treatment of paediatric and adolescent patients with prolactinomas between 2009 and 2018. Results Our cohort of nine patients had a median age at diagnosis of 13 years (range 5-17). Main presenting symptoms were weight gain, disorders of the pituitary-gonadal axis and headache. Treatment with cabergoline resulted in a marked reduction in prolactin concentration in all nine patients. Tumour mass reduction was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in seven patients. Noteworthy is that cabergoline therapy triggered frequent adverse effects in a total of eight patients - seven of whom suffered from mental disorders, five of whom had neurological symptoms and five of whom had gastrointestinal problems. The adverse effects occurred at a median dose of only 0.5 mg/week (range 0.25-2.0). Most symptoms were alleviated after the cabergoline dose was lowered. Therapy discontinuation was not necessary in any patient. Conclusions Cabergoline effectively lowers prolactin levels and may reduce tumour mass in paediatric and adolescent patients with prolactinomas. Potential adverse effects may include mental disorders and behavioural problems even at low cabergoline doses. Low starting doses and careful individual dose adjustments are required to enable therapy adherence.

Giant cabergoline-resistant prolactinoma in a man who presented with a psychotic episode during treatment: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Prolactinomas are tumors of the pituitary gland that usually respond very well to treatment with cabergoline. Resistance to cabergoline is very rare, but when it occurs, it is a difficult problem to resolve if the tumor is inoperable. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old white man was treated for a giant macroprolactinoma detected during investigation of a subacute subdural hematoma of the left frontal lobe. The patient was treated with cabergoline for 17 years with a dose ranging from 1.0 mg to 3.5 mg per week. We were not able to normalize his prolactin level, which initially was 14,992 ng/ml and ultimately 1754 ng/ml. The tumor significantly shrank during the follow-up period but persisted. The patient had cardiac valvulopathies that did not worsen. He had an ischemic stroke and developed a psychotic condition that was successfully treated by lowering the cabergoline and administering quetiapine and mirtazapine together. This regimen led to a small increase in the patient's prolactin that returned to previous levels and remained as such until the last medical evaluation. The tumor continued to shrink and had a cystic degeneration in the last evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of cabergoline with quetiapine and mirtazapine to treat a psychotic crisis may have contributed to shrinking the tumor in our patient because these antipsychotics have action mediated by growth factors that interfere with growth of pituitary tumors.

Cabergoline: a review of its use in the inhibition of lactation for women living with HIV.

INTRODUCTION: In developed countries, breastfeeding is not recommended for women living with human immunodeficiency virus (WLWH). However, lactation symptoms can be distressing for women who choose not to breastfeed. There is currently no universal guideline on the most appropriate options for prevention or reduction of lactation symptoms amongst WLWH. This review describes the evidence base for using cabergoline, a dopaminergic agonist, for the post-partum inhibition of lactation for WLWH. METHODS: A scoping review of post-partum pharmaceutical lactation inhibition specific for WLWH was conducted using searches in PubMed, Medline Ovid, EBM Reviews Ovid, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus until 2019. A narrative review of cabergoline pharmacologic properties, therapeutic efficacy, tolerability data and drug interaction data relevant to lactation inhibition was then conducted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among 1366 articles, the scoping review identified 13 relevant publications. Eight guidelines providing guidance regarding lactation inhibition for WLWH and two surveys of medical practice on this topic in UK have been published. Three studies have evaluated the use of pharmaceutical agents in WLWH. Two of these studies evaluated cabergoline and reported it to be an effective method of lactation inhibition in this population. The third study evaluated ethinyl estradiol and bromocriptine use and showed poor efficacy. Cabergoline is a long-acting dopamine D2 agonist and ergot derivative that inhibits prolactin secretion and suppresses physiologic lactation when given as a single oral dose of 1 mg after delivery. Cabergoline is at least as effective as bromocriptine for lactation inhibition with success rates between 78% and 100%. Transient, mild to moderate adverse events to cabergoline are described in clinical trials. Few drug interactions exist as cabergoline is neither a substrate nor an inducer/inhibitor of hepatic cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. There are no reported clinically significant drug-drug interactions between cabergoline and any antiretroviral medications including protease inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Cabergoline is a safe and effective pharmacologic option for the prevention of physiological lactation and associated physical symptoms in non-breastfeeding women. Future studies should focus on its safety, efficacy and acceptability among WLWH.